<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions of Balance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anamchara.com/2008/03/26/questions-of-balance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anamchara.com/2008/03/26/questions-of-balance/</link>
	<description>The fullness of joy is to behold God in all. — Julian of Norwich</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:33:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://anamchara.com/2008/03/26/questions-of-balance/#comment-6524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccolman.wordpress.com/?p=812#comment-6524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have this to add to your balanced view of &quot;balance&quot;: I have often found that at various places in the journey, loyalty to healthy balanced living requires what appears at the time to be radically UNbalanced: an emotionally violent change, a conscious reversal or renouncing of something we have been attached to, a new openness to aspects of life that we have been ignorant of, etc. This kind of revolutionary approach requires a certain boldness to come out of our comfort zone, and a kind of openness to serendipity or cosmically pre-ordained meetings or epiphanies; but over time I have observed that its overall effect is of a richer and yes, more balanced repertory and understanding of life than the all-too-timid approach that seems easier but ends up more barren and unsatisfying.

A concrete example could be that if you find that you are relatively successful in one of Wilber&#039;s 4 categories but less so in one of the others, you could start a bold new venture (meditation, aerobics, evening classes) which would take you out of your comfort zone but probably end up with a healthier, more complete and more balanced &#039;you.&#039;

Blessings on your search,
Peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this to add to your balanced view of &#8220;balance&#8221;: I have often found that at various places in the journey, loyalty to healthy balanced living requires what appears at the time to be radically UNbalanced: an emotionally violent change, a conscious reversal or renouncing of something we have been attached to, a new openness to aspects of life that we have been ignorant of, etc. This kind of revolutionary approach requires a certain boldness to come out of our comfort zone, and a kind of openness to serendipity or cosmically pre-ordained meetings or epiphanies; but over time I have observed that its overall effect is of a richer and yes, more balanced repertory and understanding of life than the all-too-timid approach that seems easier but ends up more barren and unsatisfying.</p>
<p>A concrete example could be that if you find that you are relatively successful in one of Wilber&#8217;s 4 categories but less so in one of the others, you could start a bold new venture (meditation, aerobics, evening classes) which would take you out of your comfort zone but probably end up with a healthier, more complete and more balanced &#8216;you.&#8217;</p>
<p>Blessings on your search,<br />
Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlB</title>
		<link>http://anamchara.com/2008/03/26/questions-of-balance/#comment-6504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CarlB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccolman.wordpress.com/?p=812#comment-6504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the single best definition of humility i ever heard was from a former roman priest.  i was all of 15 at the time and wrestling with all sorts of spirituality and personal issues.  in this &#039;chance&#039; encounter i cornered him and asked him simply what was &#039;humility&#039;.  his answer?  humility is the truth.  i have used that measure for 23 years now and have found it robust and profound.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the single best definition of humility i ever heard was from a former roman priest.  i was all of 15 at the time and wrestling with all sorts of spirituality and personal issues.  in this &#8216;chance&#8217; encounter i cornered him and asked him simply what was &#8216;humility&#8217;.  his answer?  humility is the truth.  i have used that measure for 23 years now and have found it robust and profound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

