<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;An Author is Not Famous Until After He Dies&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anamchara.com/2009/12/20/an-author-is-not-famous-until-after-he-dies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anamchara.com/2009/12/20/an-author-is-not-famous-until-after-he-dies/</link>
	<description>The fullness of joy is to behold God in all. — Julian of Norwich</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:33:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Krumpos</title>
		<link>http://anamchara.com/2009/12/20/an-author-is-not-famous-until-after-he-dies/#comment-18058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Krumpos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anamchara.com/?p=2705#comment-18058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl,

While I also study the great mystics of the past, there are many 20th C. mystics who are quite important.  Mysticism is a living tradition.

Judaism’s Abraham Isaac Kook, Islam’s Sir Muhammad Iqbal, Hinduism’s Sri Aurobindo Ghose, Christianity’s Thomas Merton, and Buddhism’s 
14th Dalai Lama. 

Also, secular mystics like Dag Hammarskjold, former Secretary General of the U.N., Vaclav Havel, past President of the Czech Republic, Ramesh Balsekar, C.E.O. of the Bank of India, Arthur Eddington, Britain’s famous physicist. 

Some contemporary female mystics: Christianity: Bernadette Roberts. Hinduism: Anandi Ma, and Amritanandamayi Ma. Islam:  Hatice Hanim, and Hagga Zakiyya. Buddhism: Dipa Ma, and Daw Yusanda]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl,</p>
<p>While I also study the great mystics of the past, there are many 20th C. mystics who are quite important.  Mysticism is a living tradition.</p>
<p>Judaism’s Abraham Isaac Kook, Islam’s Sir Muhammad Iqbal, Hinduism’s Sri Aurobindo Ghose, Christianity’s Thomas Merton, and Buddhism’s<br />
14th Dalai Lama. </p>
<p>Also, secular mystics like Dag Hammarskjold, former Secretary General of the U.N., Vaclav Havel, past President of the Czech Republic, Ramesh Balsekar, C.E.O. of the Bank of India, Arthur Eddington, Britain’s famous physicist. </p>
<p>Some contemporary female mystics: Christianity: Bernadette Roberts. Hinduism: Anandi Ma, and Amritanandamayi Ma. Islam:  Hatice Hanim, and Hagga Zakiyya. Buddhism: Dipa Ma, and Daw Yusanda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl McColman</title>
		<link>http://anamchara.com/2009/12/20/an-author-is-not-famous-until-after-he-dies/#comment-15303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl McColman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anamchara.com/?p=2705#comment-15303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s important when reading Merton or Main or Keating or any of the other contemporary/recent authors, to immerse ourselves in the texts they would have studied — which is why I keep turning back to the great mystics of the past. And as for my experience, I find the writers of the past to be just as accessible and just as useful as anything written in the last fifty to seventy-five years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s important when reading Merton or Main or Keating or any of the other contemporary/recent authors, to immerse ourselves in the texts they would have studied — which is why I keep turning back to the great mystics of the past. And as for my experience, I find the writers of the past to be just as accessible and just as useful as anything written in the last fifty to seventy-five years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noel</title>
		<link>http://anamchara.com/2009/12/20/an-author-is-not-famous-until-after-he-dies/#comment-15302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anamchara.com/?p=2705#comment-15302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by the way i think more accessible and also more useful are the writings and reflections of john main ,bede griffiths, abhishiktananda..........i guess you could say these are more contemporary journeyers on the mystic path]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way i think more accessible and also more useful are the writings and reflections of john main ,bede griffiths, abhishiktananda&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.i guess you could say these are more contemporary journeyers on the mystic path</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noel</title>
		<link>http://anamchara.com/2009/12/20/an-author-is-not-famous-until-after-he-dies/#comment-15300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anamchara.com/?p=2705#comment-15300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes carl i have de caussade s book. it is excellent. it seems to be written for the benefit of nuns. it is i think more examination of conscience than teaching]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes carl i have de caussade s book. it is excellent. it seems to be written for the benefit of nuns. it is i think more examination of conscience than teaching</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

